27th Sunday in Ordinary Time
In
the Gospel today there seems to be a reversal of what we usually see in these regular sparring matches between Jesus and the
Pharisees. Usually, it’s the Pharisees who are taking the “hard line” about
some teaching of the law or another, whether it is about ritual purity
(complaining that the disciples of Jesus do not meticulously wash their hands
as they do) or about the Sabbath (criticizing Jesus for curing on the Sabbath),
or other things along these lines. And then
it is Jesus who contextualizes and
approaches these laws with a little more nuance and pastoral prudence,
explaining, for example, that interior purity
is more important than mere external observation
of the law, or reminding us that the Sabbath was made for us and not the other way around. So, we’re used to the Pharisees being the
hardline “rules guys” and Jesus being the guy who – in so many words and ways –
says “Lighten up already” or at least “Get your priorities straight.”
But in this Gospel, it seems to be
reversed. Here the Pharisees are making
the case that because Moses allowed for divorce, then presumably Jesus would be
okay with this too. But here Jesus seems to take the harder
line. Saying that it was only “because
of the hardness of [their] hearts” that Moses allowed for this, but that “from
the beginning of creation,” in making man and woman for each other to become one flesh, this was not God’s intent. Jesus even
explains to disciples later that “whoever divorces his wife and marries another
commits adultery against her; and if she divorces her husband and marries
another, she commits adultery.” What
happened to “nice” Jesus? What happed to
“laid back” Jesus?
Well, first of all, I would say that I
think this exposes a gross mischaracterization
of Jesus on our part. If we look more
closely at the words and actions of Jesus across the four Gospels, the myth of
the “easy-going buddy Jesus” is pretty quickly dispelled. It’s not that Jesus is such a hardnosed “rule
follower,” so much as He is constantly
calling us to a higher standard. He is
constantly calling us out of this kind of moral and spiritual minimalism (in the sense of “What’s the minimum I have to do to get to heaven?”)
and inviting us to take the higher path, which is usually the harder path, but in the end is the only true path and the path that leads to
abundant life.
And of course, as with all Scripture, context is everything. And so, in this particular passage there are
few things in the background that we should be aware of. It says that the Pharisees were “testing” Jesus. As they often do, they pose an intentionally
tricky question and then wait to pounce.
It’s just like when they ask Him about whether or not it is lawful to
pay taxes to Caesar. If He says flat
“yes,” then they brand Him as a traitor to His own people subjugated by the
Romans. If He says flat “no” then they
turn Him in to the Romans as a troublemaker.
And so, in this case they pose this
question of divorce and wait, hungrily, for His answer. If He answers, “Yeah, sure, Moses allowed for
it, so fine by me.” Then they could
easily accuse Him of not taking marriage seriously
enough. But if He takes too hard a line, then they can throw the
Law of Moses back in his face, as if to say, “Well Moses allowed for it. Are you smarter and better than Moses?” (Which
He is, but they don’t know that.)
But in both of these cases, Jesus cuts
right through the middle, to the very heart of the matter and offers a response
that simply doesn’t play into their trap – not
because He’s just being clever or slippery, but just because speaking the truth in love has a way of
doing that. In the question about taxes,
you’ll recall He takes a Roman coin and asks whose image it bears. When they answer, “Caesar,” He says,
“Then repay to Caesar what belongs to Caesar and to God what belongs to God,” leaving them all dumbfounded. And in this question about divorce, He says effectively, “Yes, Moses allowed for this, but only for the hardness of your hearts.” He explains that “from the beginning” it was not so. From the beginning God had a higher ideal of what marriage was to be and “for this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, no human being must separate.”
“Then repay to Caesar what belongs to Caesar and to God what belongs to God,” leaving them all dumbfounded. And in this question about divorce, He says effectively, “Yes, Moses allowed for this, but only for the hardness of your hearts.” He explains that “from the beginning” it was not so. From the beginning God had a higher ideal of what marriage was to be and “for this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, no human being must separate.”
Also, something that very much plays
into the context of this passage was perhaps a too lenient approach in regard to divorce on the part of some, even
the religious authorities, of Jesus’
time. This was a time and a culture,
after all, in which a man could “lawfully” divorce his wife for seemingly very
little cause – but note, not the other way around. This was time, too, when a woman could be
stoned to death for committing adultery (and without the need to produce much
in the way of evidence or corroborating testimony, I might add) – but again note, not the other way around. And so, part of Jesus’ strident defense of
marriage here, is precisely to call out the hypocrisy and the moral laxity of
the Pharisees, who after all claim to
live by God’s law.
Now, I need to add something very important
at this point. I would wager that most, if
not all, of us here in this chapel
this morning/evening know personally
the reality of divorce within our families or at least among our friends. Perhaps some here are divorced. Perhaps some of you have parents who are
divorced. I myself have three siblings
who are divorced. And in each of their
cases, I understand (at least to the degree that I can) why, however sad, this
was necessary. So, I don’t want you to
misunderstand my words as “judging,” much less as “condemning.” The Church herself teaches that in certain
circumstances, especially when there is a situation of abuse, for example,
civil divorce “may be tolerated” and does not necessarily “constitute a moral offense.” There are instances too when one party is
willing to do whatever it takes to work on the marriage, but the other party
obstinately refuses. But I think we can
all agree that, whatever the circumstances, divorce is not a good in itself, much less something to be “celebrated” or taken
lightly. It is always sad and difficult
for the individuals involved and their families.
Still, why does Jesus seem to be so “tough” on this issue? I think it can only be because Jesus understands that there is something so important about marriage; something so central to our human existence. There is something here worth defending so
fiercely. If you think of it, Jesus’
public ministry began at a marriage,
at the wedding feast of Cana, as recounted in John’s Gospel. This should tell us something about the place
of marriage in the Christian life. Also,
the Bible begins, in a sense, with
marriage, in the story from Genesis about Adam and Eve, which we heard in
our first reading, and the Bible ends with
marriage, as in the Book of Revelation we hear that beautiful imagery of
the “New Jerusalem,” an image of the Church in her final state, “coming down
out of heaven…prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.” And everywhere in between, in the various
covenants established between God and His people, the language and imagery of marriage is used. Jesus Himself
uses this spousal imagery in the parable about the “wedding feast,” and even on
several occasions refers to himself as the “bridegroom.” What does this all mean?
It
is through the lens of Marriage that
we see most clearly God’s love for us.
Marriage is that great image
and icon of God’s love for his
people, of Christ the bridegroom’s
love for his bride, the Church. Even in regard to vocations to religious life
we use this spousal language and
imagery, as religious sisters are sometimes referred to as “brides of Christ,”
and we speak of the priesthood in terms of a kind of spousal relationship with Church.
And so, marriage is that “window,” that “portal” through which we see
and experience God’s love in the
world. In this sense, marriage is not
only the most natural vocation of
human beings, but perhaps the most essential. Many here are married. Most of the Church is married. Most of our students will one day be married. As marriage goes so will go the Church, so
will go the world and for generations. And so, let’s hear Jesus out on this; let’s
be sure to understand His teaching well – which is at once hard and yet merciful. Let’s seek healing for past hurts. Let’s extend a loving welcome for our sisters
and brothers who may have experienced divorce.
Let’s pray for prudence for those preparing for marriage, for patience
and perseverance for those who have already committed themselves in this
lifelong covenant, and for a strengthening of marriage in our time for nothing less than the glory of God and
the sanctification of humankind.